USGS - science for a changing world

Water Science for Maryland, Delaware and the District of Columbia

Home >> Publications >> Online Publication - WRIR 00-4283

Optimization of Groundwater Withdrawal at the Old O-Field Area, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

By William S.L. Banks and Jonathan J.A. Dillow

>> Download WRIR 00-4283
     (2 Mb PDF Document)

Abstract

The U.S. Army disposed of chemical agents, laboratory materials, and unexploded ordnance at the Old O-Field landfill at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, beginning prior to World War II and continuing until at least the 1950's. Soil, Groundwater, surface water, and wetland sediments in the Old O-Field area were contaminated by the disposal of these materials. The site is in the Atlantic Coastal Plain, and is characterized by a complex series of Pleistocene and Holocene sediments formed in various fluvial, estuarine, and marine-marginal hydrogeologic environments. A previously constructed transient finite-difference Groundwater-flow model was used to simulate Groundwater flow and the effects of a pump-and-treat remediation system designed to prevent contaminated Groundwater from flowing into Watson Creek (a tidal estuary and a tributary to the Gunpowder River). The remediation system consists of 14 extraction wells located between the Old O-Field landfill and Watson Creek.

Linear programming techniques were applied to the results of the flow-model simulations to identify optimal pumping strategies for the remediation system. The optimal management objective is to minimize total withdrawal from the water-table aquifer, while adhering to the following constraints: (1) Groundwater flow from the landfill should be prevented from reaching Watson Creek, (2) no extraction pump should be operated at a rate that exceeds its capacity, and (3) no extraction pump should be operated at a rate below its minimum capacity, the minimum rate at which an Old O-Field pump can function. Water withdrawal is minimized by varying the rate and frequency of pumping at each of the 14 extraction wells over time. This minimizes the costs of both pumping and water treatment, thus providing the least-cost remediation alternative while simultaneously meeting all operating constraints.

The optimal strategy identified using this objective and constraint set involved operating 13 of the 14 extraction wells at rates ranging from 0.4 to 4.9 gallons per minute.


Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://md.water.usgs.gov/publications/wrir-00-4283/index.html
Page Contact Information: webmaster@md.water.usgs.gov
Page Last Modified: Thursday, September 14, 2017