Frequently Asked Questions - The Hydrology of Floods
The following questions and answers provide background on some of the scientific issues regarding floods. For questions on regulatory issues, such as flood-plain restrictions in states and localities, please refer to the appropriate authority in your jurisdiction. For information on flood prevention, flood management, or disaster relief, you should refer to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) at http://www.fema.gov/ or to your local emergency management agency.
Questions and answers are original compositions or are compiled from any available sources and credit is given where appropriate. New material will be added as needed. Contributions are welcome.
- Weather and Floods
- What causes floods?
- Statistics and Measurements of Floods
- What is a recurrence interval?
- Does a 100-year storm always cause a 100-year flood?
- Can two "100-year floods" occur within several years or even within the same year?
- How can the same streamflow be a 100-year flood in one location and only a 50-year flood at another?
- How is peak flow determined?
Weather and Floods
Flooding occurs in known floodplains when prolonged rainfall over several days, intense rainfall over a short period of time, or an ice or debris jam causes a river or stream to overflow and flood the surrounding area. Melting snow can combine with rain in the winter and early spring; severe thunderstorms can bring heavy rain in the spring and summer; or tropical cyclones can bring intense rainfall to the coastal and inland states in the summer and fall.
Flash floods occur within six hours of a rain event, or after a dam or levee failure, or following a sudden release of water held by an ice or debris jam, and flash floods can catch people unprepared. You will not always have a warning that these deadly, sudden floods are coming. So if you live in areas prone to flash floods, plan now to protect your family and property.
As land is converted from fields or woodlands to roads and parking lots, it loses its ability to absorb rainfall. Urbanization increases runoff two to six times over what would occur on natural terrain. During periods of urban flooding, streets can become swift moving rivers, while basements and viaducts can become death traps as they fill with water.
Several factors contribute to flooding. Two key elements are rainfall intensity and duration. Intensity is the rate of rainfall, and duration is how long the rain lasts. Topography, soil conditions, and ground cover also play important roles. Most flash flooding is caused by slow-moving thunderstorms, thunderstorms repeatedly moving over the same area, or heavy rains from hurricanes and tropical storms. Floods, on the other hand, can be slow- or fast-rising, but generally develop over a period of hours or days.
Learn about flooding and flash flooding in your area by contacting the local emergency management office, National Weather Service (NWS) office, your American Red Cross chapter, or your planning and zoning department. If you are at risk, take steps to reduce damage and the risk of injury or loss to your family.
Reference: National Disaster Education Coalition, 1999
Statistics and Measurements of Floods
Statistical techniques, through a process called frequency analysis, are used to estimate the probability of the occurrence of a given event. The recurrence interval (sometimes called the return period) is based on the probability that the given event will be equalled or exceeded in any given year. For example, there may be a 1 in 50 chance that 6.60 inches of rain will fall in a county in a 24-hour period during any given year. Thus, the rainfall total of 6.60 inches in a consecutive 24-hour period is said to have a 50-year recurrence interval. Likewise, using a frequency analysis (Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, 1982) there may be a 1 in 100 chance that a streamflow of 15,000 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) will occur during any year in a particular stream. Thus, the peak flow of 15,000 ft3/s is said to have a 100-year recurrence interval. Rainfall recurrence intervals are based on both the magnitude and the duration of a rainfall event, whereas streamflow recurrence intervals are based solely on the magnitude of the annual peak flow.
Ten or more years of data are required to perform a frequency analysis for the determination of recurrence intervals. More confidence can be placed in the results of a frequency analysis based on, for example, 30 years of record than on an analysis based on 10 years of record.
Current rainfall recurrence intervals used in hydrologic analysis were developed less than 10 years ago (Bonnin and others, 2006). These recurrence intervals may become better defined as more recent local data become available for analysis.
Recurrence intervals for the annual peak streamflow at a given location change if there are significant changes in the flow patterns at that location, possibly caused by an impoundment or diversion of flow. The effects of development (conversion of land from forested or agricultural uses to commercial, residential, or industrial uses) on peak flows is generally much greater for low-recurrence interval floods than for high-recurrence interval (larger, less frequent) floods. During these larger floods, the soil is saturated and does not have the capacity to absorb additional rainfall. Under these conditions, essentially all of the rain that falls, whether on paved surfaces or on saturated soil, runs off and becomes streamflow.
Modified from Robinson, Hazell, and Young, 1998
No. Several factors can independently influence the cause-and-effect relation between rainfall and streamflow.
When rainfall data are collected at a point within a stream basin, it is highly unlikely that this same amount of rainfall occurred uniformly throughout the entire basin. During intensely localized storms, rainfall amounts throughout the basin can differ greatly from the rainfall amount measured at the location of the raingage. Some parts of the basin may even remain dry, supplying no additional runoff to the streamflow and lessening the impact of the storm. Consequently, only part of the basin may experience a 100-year rainfall event.
Existing conditions prior to the storm can influence the amount of stormwater runoff into the stream system. Dry soil allows greater infiltration of rainfall and reduces the amount of runoff entering the stream. Conversely, soil that is already wet from previous rains has a lower capacity for infiltration, allowing more runoff to enter the stream.
Another factor to consider is the relation between the duration of the storm and the size of the stream basin in which the storm occurs. For example, a 100-year storm of 30-minutes duration in a 1-square-mile (mi2) basin will have a more significant effect on streamflow than the same storm in a 50-mi2 basin. Generally, streams with larger drainage areas require storms of longer duration for a significant increase in streamflow to occur.
Modified from Robinson, Hazell, and Young, 1998 .
Yes. This question points out the importance of proper terminology. The term "100-year flood" is used in an attempt to simplify the definition of a flood that statistically has a 1-percent chance of occurring in any given year. Likewise, the term "100-year storm" is used to define a rainfall event that statistically has this same 1-percent chance of occurring. In other words, over the course of 1 million years, these events would be expected to occur 10,000 times.These events, as well as any recurring events, are assumed to be statistically independent of each other.
Therefore, each year begins with the same 1-percent chance that a 100-year event will occur.
Recurrence interval, in years
Probability of occurrence in any given year
Percent chance of occurrence in any given year
Modified from Robinson, Hazell, and Young, 1998
Recurrence intervals are based on the probability of the peak streamflow occurring at a given location in any year. As water flows downstream from point "A" to point "B" and the drainage area increases, the volume of streamflow increases. Given this, it may seem reasonable to think that peak flows would increase in the same manner, but this is not necessarily true. The flow at any particular point on a stream depends on local stream channel and floodplain conditions as well as on conditions upstream or downstream of the point, such as channel slope, floodplain shape, and any impoundments of streamflow.
Downstream points on a stream will have always have greater total volume of streamflow resulting from flooding (except in certain very unique situations), but the rate of streamflow can be quite different from upstream points, and will often be less. In these cases, streamflow will remain elevated for a longer period of time. This phenomenon, known as peak attenuation, can be attributed to several variables. A narrow, efficient stream channel will allow the water to pass quickly, resulting in a nearly instantaneous increase in peak flow. At locations where the stream channel widens or may contain heavy vegetation, the water velocity may decrease. Also, as the peak flow moves downstream, water may move into the floodplain where it is stored until the water level begins to recede. As the water level recedes, the stored water in the floodplain will slowly re-enter the stream. These combined factors explain why the peak flow may be less in magnitude but longer in duration as the flood progresses downstream.
Modified from Robinson, Hazell, and Young, 1998
Stream stage (or water level) and streamflow (or discharge) are measured at locations called streamflow gaging stations. Stage is measured and recorded continuously by electronic instruments to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. Stage information from most streamflow gaging stations is transmitted hourly by satellite or telephone telemetry to USGS computers.
Flow is more difficult to measure accurately and continuously than is stage. Discharge at each gaging station is typically determined from an established stage-discharge relation, or rating curve that is unique to the station location. Individual discharge measurements are made by USGS personnel at a gaging station using standard procedures (Rantz and others, 1982); ideally, these measurements are made when the stage is not changing. A series of these measurements made over a range of flow conditions defines the rating curve, which is used to convert continuous measurements of stage to a continuous record of discharge. Channel changes, resulting from scour, deposition, vegetation, or other processes, alter the stage-discharge relation, so that discharge measurements must be made routinely and continuously to ensure that the rating curve remains accurate.
A rating curve is considered accurate only over the range for which discharge measurements have been made. Discharge measurements sometimes are not available for the full range of flows at gaging stations that have been in operation for only a few years. Even at gaging stations that have been in continuous operation for 30 years or more, direct discharge measurements for extremely high flows are difficult to obtain because (1) these events are rare, (2) debris often accumulates in the channel, (3) extreme peak flows may persist for only a short period of time, and (4) measurement sites are often inaccessible due to road or bridge closures.
Estimates of peak flows which are outside the range of the established rating curve may be made by an extrapolation of the rating curve to the peak stage. At some gaging stations, indirect methods of discharge determination based on high-water marks, channel properties, and hydraulic principles may be used to obtain an independent estimate of discharge. These indirect methods generally require accurate field surveys to determine high-water marks, channel properties, and channel shape. The information obtained in the field is then processed using computer programs to determine the discharge. Continued evaluation of these discharge computations may result in revision of previously determined peak flows.
Modified from Robinson, Hazell, and Young, 1998.
- Bonnin, G.M, Martin, D., Lin, B., Parzybok, T., Yekta, M., and Riley, D., 2006
Precipitation frequency atlas of the United States NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3.0; NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland.
- Intergency Advisory Committee on Water Data, 1982
Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency: U.S. Department of the Interior, Reston, Va., Bulletin 17B of the Hydrology Subcommittee.
- National Disaster Education Coalition, 1999
Talking about disaster: Guide for standard messages: Produced by the National Disaster Education Coalition, Washington, D.C., p. 63-64.
- Rantz and others, 1982
Measurement and computation of streamflow: Volume 2, computation of discharge: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2175, p. 285-631.
- Robinson, J.B., Hazell, W.F., and Young, W.S., 1998
Effects of August 1995 and July 1997 storms in the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-036-98, 6 p.